Archive for the ‘Business Process Management’ Category

Calibration, What’s Missing from Your System?

Monday, April 5, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

Quality management system standards homogeneously have requirements for controlling the devices used to measure, verify, test, and accept product and monitor the processes used to achieve specified results. As a third party auditor it has come to my attention that everyone seems to miss something. It’s almost unavoidable. Perchance it’s because this process is by and large referred to as “calibration” and the rational image it invokes is associated primarily with things like micrometers, depth gages, and comparators. The process is often much more complex, addressing apt consideration for gages, thermostats, software, jigs, timers, known-good-samples – a multiple of devices for measuring product or process. Controlling monitoring and measuring devices must, therefore, include multiple aspects. 

Some areas which you should consider when setting up your system should included:

*Identifying which devices need to be calibrated and which do not (you decide based on your quality criteria and your customer requirements).

* Defining the frequencies needed to insure calibration is well controlled
* Indicating the status of equipment; calibrated or out of calibration
* Determining alternate methods of “control”
* Determining what to include in the procedure
* How will you handle certificates of calibration
* Will you use outsourced calibration services and how will you control this if you do
* Defining storage and preservation criteria in your process
* Defining recall programs and contingency plans

ISO 9001 Internal Auditing Success

Wednesday, March 31, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

The third party auditor will audit your system once or twice a year, so why do you have to conduct internal audits? The first and most obvious reason is, if you wait for the third party auditor to tell you your system is in trouble, you are missing the point of continuous improvement all together. The second reason is that the third party registrar does not consider the surveillance audit as an internal audit. The standard requires that “you” perform planned internal audits of your system based on status and importance of the processes and areas to be audited. If you do not know whether or not your quality management system conforms to your planned arrangements, or the standard, then how can you determine if you are improving? The ISO 9001 standard is based on the Plan, Do, Check, Act principle of continuous improvement. Internal Auditing is the “Check”, and without it you may never know when to act.

The internal audit process need not be a time consuming; there are many ways an internal audit can be accomplished. Every day we conduct countless audits without even knowing it. A manager who walks the plant floor may notice a process which is not working as intended, a worker may notice that the forms he, or she is using are outdated , receiving may find that the same supplier never send the correct paperwork with the products they provide; these are audits that never get documented. These audits are not planned, but they are audits none the less. The planned audits do not have to include all of the processes in your facility once a year, remember “Status and importance”. Go after the low hanging fruit first, (areas where you are having issues), then review the other areas as needed. Whatever you do, DO SOMETHING, or your entire quality system will fail to accomplish the goals and objectives you have set for your organization. My philosophy is simple, if you are going to invest the time and money to become certified, get the full value of certification or you will be wasting your resources for nothing.

ISO 9001 Paper or Software?

Monday, March 29, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

 

When setting up your quality management system it is important to understand your options and their advantages and disadvantages. I have been involved with developing and implementing ISO 9001 and AS 9100 quality management systems both through a manual paper system and an automated software system.  Each option has very distinct advantages and disadvantages which can help you determine which way your organization should go.

Option # 1 the paper system. This system is best implemented in a small to mid size organization where control is easily maintained. A paper system can get extremely convoluted in larger companies, which can result in inadequate control and subsequent non-conformances during a third party audit. The key to implementing a successful paper quality management system is to keep it simple and manageable. If your system requires excessive maintenance it will become a burden  which may result in the failure of the system to yield the continual improvement objectives that it was set up to achieve.

Option # 2 the software approach. This system is advantages in both small and large companies and offers the added advantage of organization and control for your entire quality management system. By setting up your system digitally you can automatically control revisions and distribution of your documentation. You will also be able to communicate non-conformances, progress towards objectives, internal audits, calibration control, preventive actions, and supplier control and customer satisfaction. Your only real limitation with this system is the level of access your organization is capable of providing. If the rank and file is unable to access the system it does you little good. The best digital systems are internet based SaaS systems which offer access anywhere, anytime to internal and external users such as customers and suppliers.

ISO 9001 Lesson Learned

Wednesday, March 24, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

ISO 9001:2008 is the foundation of many of the quality management standards now available to organizations worldwide to help organize and maintain product and service integrity. The standard in and of itself, does not tell you “HOW “ to do anything but rather it tells you what quality programs and processes you need to establish to meet the requirements of the standard. For example: The standard has numerous passages which state the organization “SHALL” develop and implement something to comply with the standard. The organization “SHALL”:

  1. determine the processes needed for the quality management system and their application throughout the organization.
  2. determine the sequence and interaction of these processes.
  3. determine criteria and methods needed to ensure that both the operation and control of these processes are effective.

The quality management system documentation “SHALL” include:

  1. documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives
  2. a quality manual
  3. documented procedures and records required by this International Standard
  4. documents, including records, determined by the organization to be necessary to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.

As you can see, nowhere in these requirements does the standard tell you exactly how to carry this out. Where many companies fall short when trying to interpret the actual intent of these requirements, is the planning process. How much documentation is enough and how will we satisfy these requirements so that what we say we do is actually what we do. A lot of the confusion comes from not understanding the standard, and then ultimately doing too much or too little. Most of the non-conformances that the third party auditor will eventually find, (90%), are written against the self imposed requirements of an organization, not against the standard itself. For example: Some companies buy document templates and insert their name here and there, but never modify the documents to meet their individual process needs. Every company is different, so you cannot buy a caned quality system without modifying it to your particular needs.

Get educated to the standard and or hire a business management consultant that can guide you through the process. ISO 9001 as well as most of the other standards out there does not have to complicated or overly time consuming. Get the most out of your system, and avoid the pit falls generated by lack of understanding.

ISO 9001 Follow-up For Effectiveness

Monday, March 22, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

The ISO 9001:2008 stand requires follow-up for effectiveness when corrective or preventive actions have taken place. Many companies do a great job of identifying corrective and preventive actions, some even excel at following through and completing these actions. But where most organizations fall short, is following up to see if what they have enacted, actually had the desired affect and corrected or prevented something from happening again or in the future.

Some organizations do follow-up for effectiveness, but never take the time to record the results of this activity. There are several areas in the ISO 9001:2008 which actually require follow-up actives take place:

1. Section 8.2.2 Internal Audit states  follow-up actives shall include the verification of actions and the reporting of verification results.

2. Section 8.5.2 Corrective Action states that a documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken, and records of the results of actions taken.

3. Section 8.5.3 Preventive Action states that a documented procedure shall be established to define the requirements for reviewing the effectiveness of the preventive actions taken, and records of the results of actions taken.

If you are certified to ISO 9001 or some other quality management system, my question to you is this; Why wouldn’t you want to know if the time and energy you put into implementing a corrective or  preventive action actual paid off? If you are going to invest the time and money to have a quality management system which is certified to a standard, shouldn’t you get something out of it? Without the data to support your decisions, aren’t you just spinning your wheels?

ISO 9001 Helping Select and Manage Your Suppliers?

Monday, March 15, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

When you purchase products or services from a supplier, you have two primary considerations:
1. Will the supplier you eventually select provide the best overall value or service which is consistent with your requirements?

2. Does the supplier have the ability to consistently provide the quality desired?

For consideration one – as the customer, you must specify criteria and quality objectives for the product. Through the use of your own quality management systems, you then confirm that delivered product meets your specifications.

For the second consideration – you may want the supplier to have  a quality management system of their own to insure consistent controls are in place. How much control? To answer this, you need to consider the following questions:

· What (goods or services) will you be purchasing?
· What significant impact could these products have on the products you make and sell to your customers?
· What are the risks to your business if you experience a major upset as a result of a product non-conformance caused by these products?
· What do you know about the character and past performance of your supplier?

ISO 9001:2008 provides requirements for the purchasing process that your organization can implement, to develop and improve relationships with suppliers. These requirements include:

· Establishment of criteria and quality objectives for products or services you expect to purchase
· And quality management system controls that you require your suppliers to develop to meet your organizational requirements.

Supplier surveillance audits are very advantages when working with a supplier who’s product could have an major impact on your continued success. By periodically auditing these suppliers to your requirements, you will be ensuring that their quality management system continues to meet the needs of your organization. Even with the best of relationships, changes can occur that may cause unforeseen catastrophic results. Keeping your supplier close and monitoring their quality system will strengthen the relationship and reduce the chances of a major upset.

Supplier auditing or supply chain surveillance is most effective and worthwhile for both organizations when approached through a shared partnership style. Traditional audits that “uncover” problems, inconsistencies and non-compliances then issuing corrective actions and/or penalties are costly, ineffective and outdated. The most effective surveillance systems will contain many business and quality management assessment elements including:

• Design management

• Reduced lead time initiatives

• Supply chain key measurable such as:

  • Product and service delivery
  • Product and service quality
  • Corrective and preventive action reporting and resolution

• Financial strength

• Continuous Improvement

• Supplier chain management

• Price reduction initiatives

• Value-added project management

The goals of the surveillance process are to keep both organizations focused on sustained success, review additional opportunities and build the relationship. When done well, there should be no bombshells going off which could affect the overall success of both business entities. When the relationship adds value to both companies, then it should be developed. If this is not the case, and there remains adequate trust between the business partners, corrective actions can be made, or a beneficial exit plan devised. Business relationships are ever changing; as the business climate changes, supply chain relationships also will change. Supplier surveillance is an effective approach to managing these changes before they become problems.

ISO 9001 Management Rep, Who Me?

Wednesday, March 10, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

Has this just happened to you? You walk into a staff meeting and it is announced that the company has decided to implement a quality management system and you will be the proud own of this system. Does a deer in the headlights come to mind as you struggle to catch your breath.  How will I ever be able to run this program and do my real job  too? I have little to no experience with ISO 9001 and I don’t have the foggiest  idea of how to begin, Help!

Stop panicking and Liston up. ISO 9001:2008 is the newest version of the popular international standard that many manufacturing and service industries subscribe to. Some of the requirements in ISO 9001:2008  include:

  • a set of procedures that cover all key processes in the business;
  • monitoring processes to ensure they are effective;
  • keeping adequate records;
  • checking output for defects, with appropriate and corrective action where necessary;
  • regularly reviewing individual processes and the quality system itself for effectiveness; and
  • facilitating continual improvement

Take a lead auditor course, or hire a professional quality management consultant to help you implement your quality system. Depending on the size and complexity of your organization and its processes, you can find a competent consultant that can help you document your system, train your employees  to the system and facilitate your management reviews and internal audits.

If you opt to go it alone, the best advise, get educated to the ISO 9001 standard. Some companies use templates to document their system. This can be a great time saver if done properly. The key with using templates is to make sure you customize them to your individual processes. Another option is software applications that help organize and manage your new system. One in particular that I have found helpful is CIS Software. This software application is an on line SaaS system which includes all of the required criteria of the ISO 9001 standard.

What ever you do, “KEEP IT SIMPLE”. Do not invent processes and producers that you will never use, these will be the land mines that will sabotage your certification efforts.

Supplier Quality Management Benefits, Responsibilities

Monday, March 8, 2010
posted by qicguru 8:00 AM

There are benefits to creating strong relationships with suppliers from a customer’s perspective especially if a standalone supplier quality management function exists. Supplier measurement can take place, risk mitigation exercises (both reactive and proactive) can be accomplished and information and improvements can be shared for common gain. A supplier quality management function can create a community for all those involved , Account Managers, Supply chain Consultants, Supplier Performance Managers,  in which they can integrate knowledge and deliver profit generating opportunities for both organizations through the exploration of additional, above and beyond current contract business opportunities .

Executive involvement is vital to the success of aligning the relevant strategic players to accomplish objectives and form the basis of building  partnerships and ultimately unlocking value for both organizations. The Procurement functions should take the central role in coordinating supplier relationships, at the same time as owning and coordinating the process, authority and technology.

Success and Failure Road Sign with dramatic clouds and sky.

I have had the chance, as a consultant and Lead QMS Auditor, to see ISO 9001 in companies big and small in many industries such as manufacturing, service, technology, aerospace, warehousing and others. I’ve grown to understand a few things that seem to make all the difference in how ISO 9001 impacts an organization, either positively or negatively.

In the worst of circumstances, some companies regard their ISO 9001 certification as an accessory that has been uncomfortably inserted into the fabric of the organization. In these companies, ISO 9001 is something to present to an auditor once a year. When the annual audit comes due, everyone rushes around to tidy up the place because “we can’t allow them to see how we really live”. Somehow they placate the auditor enough to come away with an extensive list of corrective actions to address, while still retaining their certification.  Once the auditor leaves, the “QMS” is quickly shoved aside so it is out of the way of the “actual” business that needs to get done.

Somewhat better are those companies who at least try to keep up with everything through the year unless an “emergency” comes up or everyone becomes too busy. Unfortunately the crisis-of-the-month and the too-busy-with-the-customer excuses are quite routine and, worse, acceptable justification to “work around the system”. In too many cases these short term lapses become the standard operating procedure. Once the dust settles things get mostly caught up until the next “all hands on deck” is signaled. These companies commonly think of ISO as a “necessary evil” that has to be tolerated.

On the flip side, there are a significant number of ISO 9001 certified organizations who appear to “get it” when it comes to achieving real value from their ISO 9001 quality management system and have incorporated it  into their daily business processes. In these companies, the management team has learned how to use the requirements imposed by the standard to their advantage by solving real problems and consistently achieve real improvements in business objectives. These organizations actually achieve real benefits by using the standard as a lever for improving both customer satisfaction and their own bottom line.

I have worked with many ISO 9001 success stories over the years and have come to realize that there are a few unmistakable similarities in how they were able to reached their goals .

In either case, the “magical prescription” to achieve genuine value from IS0 9001 are a direct result of:

  • Keeping it simple (K.I.S.S)!
  • Focusing on business importance!
  • Never doing anything just to please an auditor!