Posts Tagged ‘continual improvement’
ISO 9001 Is It Just Another Expense?
When I hear a manager say ISO 9001 is just another expense, I immediately know that this organization doesn’t have a clue what ISO 9001 is. Lip service is just that, if you put nothing into your quality management system, you will get exactly nothing in return. ISO 9001 is a quality standard which aims to guide an organization to understand its own business better so that it can meet or exceed its customer needs. By implementing a “successful” quality system the organization will see tangible improvements that lead to reduced costs and increases in market share.
How does this happen, the reduced costs and increased market share? Well if you think just because you plop a system in, you will instantly see the money, think again. This is a process, a process that develops and matures over time which is spurred on by increased awareness and understanding throughout the organization. As you learn more about your internal processes and link them to your customer needs, you will begin to reap the rewords of your efforts.
So get serious about your companies goals and how you will achieve them, (plan) your processes, work your system (Do), (Check) your progress toward achieving your objectives, and make the necessary changes along the way to keep on track (Act). If you are like so many other companies out there, you could use a little help getting started. There are plenty of quality consultants and classes that can do just that. But once you finally “GET IT; your system should become an effortless process that runs like a Swiss watch. This process should not add work or drain resources; rather it should run itself because it is how you do business every day.
Don’t get involved in ISO 9001 with the belief that it is just another expense. Make the process pay for itself by understanding, believing and promoting, and driving your goals and expectations to completion. Lead and you will succeed, or don’t and throw your money and future expectations away. One thing is for sure at the end of the day, if you don’t put your best foot forward, somebody else will.
ISO 9001: Management Review What’s It All About?
Section 5.6 if the ISO 9001:2008 standard requires that top management reviews the organizations quality management system in order to determine its continued suitability, adequacy and effectiveness. There are many ways to satisfy this requirement. Many companies miss interpret this passage to mean they must have a meeting specifically to satisfy this section of the standard. Some companies even go so far as to impose mandatory monthly meeting for this purpose. The standard does not say anything about a meeting, it says you must review the inputs and out puts of your processes at planned intervals.
You must decide how often it is necessary to carry out the review of the required inputs and outputs and how you will review them. You can have several meeting during a given time period during which you address one or more of the requirement at each meeting, (production meetings, customer service sales meetings, quality MRB meetings, annual state of the business meetings, safety meetings, etc). You may decide that top management can satisfy this requirement by individually reviewing the inputs and outputs of the QMS electronically and communicating the results to the organization through action plans to individual departments, group meetings, or supervisor dissemination to the work force. You may decide to go the traditional route and have scheduled management review meetings quarterly or yearly.
The key here is you must decide how and when, and then you must make sure this plan is carried out. When deciding, keep in mind the purpose of this exercise is continual improvement. Don’t invent an elaborate review process that does not add value, make it work for you.
ISO 9001 Lesson Learned
ISO 9001:2008 is the foundation of many of the quality management standards now available to organizations worldwide to help organize and maintain product and service integrity. The standard in and of itself, does not tell you “HOW “ to do anything but rather it tells you what quality programs and processes you need to establish to meet the requirements of the standard. For example: The standard has numerous passages which state the organization “SHALL” develop and implement something to comply with the standard. The organization “SHALL”:
- determine the processes needed for the quality management system and their application throughout the organization.
- determine the sequence and interaction of these processes.
- determine criteria and methods needed to ensure that both the operation and control of these processes are effective.
The quality management system documentation “SHALL” include:
- documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives
- a quality manual
- documented procedures and records required by this International Standard
- documents, including records, determined by the organization to be necessary to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.
As you can see, nowhere in these requirements does the standard tell you exactly how to carry this out. Where many companies fall short when trying to interpret the actual intent of these requirements, is the planning process. How much documentation is enough and how will we satisfy these requirements so that what we say we do is actually what we do. A lot of the confusion comes from not understanding the standard, and then ultimately doing too much or too little. Most of the non-conformances that the third party auditor will eventually find, (90%), are written against the self imposed requirements of an organization, not against the standard itself. For example: Some companies buy document templates and insert their name here and there, but never modify the documents to meet their individual process needs. Every company is different, so you cannot buy a caned quality system without modifying it to your particular needs.
Get educated to the standard and or hire a business management consultant that can guide you through the process. ISO 9001 as well as most of the other standards out there does not have to complicated or overly time consuming. Get the most out of your system, and avoid the pit falls generated by lack of understanding.
ISO 9001 Follow-up For Effectiveness
The ISO 9001:2008 stand requires follow-up for effectiveness when corrective or preventive actions have taken place. Many companies do a great job of identifying corrective and preventive actions, some even excel at following through and completing these actions. But where most organizations fall short, is following up to see if what they have enacted, actually had the desired affect and corrected or prevented something from happening again or in the future.
Some organizations do follow-up for effectiveness, but never take the time to record the results of this activity. There are several areas in the ISO 9001:2008 which actually require follow-up actives take place:
1. Section 8.2.2 Internal Audit states 
follow-up actives shall include the verification of actions and the reporting of verification results.
2. Section 8.5.2 Corrective Action states that a documented procedure shall be established to define requirements for reviewing the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken, and records of the results of actions taken.
3. Section 8.5.3 Preventive Action states that a documented procedure shall be established to define the requirements for reviewing the effectiveness of the preventive actions taken, and records of the results of actions taken.
If you are certified to ISO 9001 or some other quality management system, my question to you is this; Why wouldn’t you want to know if the time and energy you put into implementing a corrective or preventive action actual paid off? If you are going to invest the time and money to have a quality management system which is certified to a standard, shouldn’t you get something out of it? Without the data to support your decisions, aren’t you just spinning your wheels?
If AS9100:2009 is published, why can’t I get certified to AS9100C now?
Before any company can be certified to the AS9100C standard, the aerospace industry must complete these milestones:
- The AS9104-1 standard must be published (expected spring 2010)
- The AS9101D standard (checklist) must be published (expected Spring 2010)
- The AS9100C/AS9101D course for certification body auditors (NQA auditors) must be developed, vetted and made available for use by certification bodies (expected by 30 April 2010)
- Certification body auditors must attend this course, pass it, submit their applications to RABQSA and get approved (we expect that to happen over the summer and fall of 2010)
- The registrars must submit an application to ANAB and then be audited before we can be accredited to perform audits to AS9100C (we expect that to happen early summer of 2010)
Once all of the above tasks are completed, registrars will be able to conduct audits to the quality management system requirements of AS9100 revision C.
As to when your company must transition to this new standard, all AS9100 audits after July 1st, 2011 must be to AS9100C and that by July 1st, 2012, AS9100B will cease to exist and all registrations for AS9100 must be to revision C of the standard.
What Happens Now That I Have My Certification?
At last we have attained certification, boy am I glad that is over. If this is what you are thinking right now, you have missed the point. Certification to ISO 9001, AS 9100 or any standard does not have a start and end point, (Implementation and Certification). Becoming certified is a continuous process which if implemented and attained correctly, with the right mind set, will result in lowering costs, and ongoing improvements for your business.
Never think that once you have reached your goal of certification that you are finished, now the hard part begins. Now you must live your quality management system day in and day out. Your processes must continue to be audited and improved, tracked and reviewed, trained and understood by all. This is your chance to reap the rewords of your planning, doing, checking and improving to become a world class organization and not just a another company with a certificate on the wall.
If you truly want to get the most out of the money and time spent to get that certificate, I suggest that you focus your attention on maintaining your system to reach peak performance. You will save money, improve relations with your customers, and knock the socks off of your competition. So why not take this certification and make it work for you?
The Internal Audit and Follow-up for Effectiveness
O.K. now that you have defined your internal auditing process, and have a few audits under your belt, what have you learned that will actually help you improve your organization? Corrective and preventive actions have been assigned, responses have been logged, and actions have taken placed. Did the actions taken, improve the process? This is probably the biggest stumbling block I have seen as a third party auditor, follow-up for effectiveness. Did anyone review the effectiveness of the corrective or preventive action; did it accomplish what you intended? If you do not go back and review the results of the actions taken, you have missed the boat on continual improvement. To merely find areas for improvement without making sure that they have been addressed and actual improvements have been made, is never going to move your company closer to sustained success.
Your business management system can be the best possible way to propel your organization to a new level of profitability and success, use it effectively! Make your quality management processes work for you and you will realize actual benefits that will lower costs, improve cycle times, reduce scrap, and improve customer satisfaction. You can skate by with your paper certificate, but wouldn’t you rather get something for your money?
Your Internal Auditing Process, Does It Hurt Or Help Continuous Improvement?
A Quality audit is the process of organized inspection of a quality management system carried out by an internal or external quality auditor or an audit team. It is an important part of organization’s quality management system and is a key element in the ISO quality system standard, ISO 9001.
Quality audits are typically performed at predefined time intervals and ensure that the institution has clearly-defined internal quality monitoring procedures linked to effective corrective and preventive actions. This can help determine if the organization complies with the defined quality system processes and can involve procedural or results-based assessment criteria.
With the upgrade of the ISO9000 series of standards from the 1994 to 2008 series, the focus of the audits has shifted from purely procedural adherence towards a process approach of the actual effectiveness of the Quality Management System and the results that have been achieved through the implementation of a QMS.
Audits are an essential management tool to be used for verifying objective evidence of processes, to assess how successfully processes have been implemented, for judging the effectiveness of achieving any defined objectives, to provide evidence concerning reduction and elimination of problem areas. For the benefit of the organization, quality auditing should not only report non-conformances and corrective actions, but also highlight areas of good practice. In this way other departments may share information and amend their working practices as a result, also contributing to continual improvement.
Internal audits should always be performed with the intension of improving the overall systems being audited, never as a fault finding or witch hunt practice designed to punish. If internal audits are properly executed with a spirit of open communication and real process improvement, this process can be the single most important driver for continual improvement. Done wrong, the internal quality audit processes can create a culture of fear which will hinder continual improvement. It is important that everyone within the organization clearly understands the objectives of quality auditing and their role in them.
Does Your Corrective Action Process Really Work?
When a deficiency in your quality management system is discovered, is it documented and thought of as a good thing? One of the most common problems I have encountered as a third party auditor and consultant is the fear of Nonconformance’s. During initial presentations to a company, particularly if I have senior management in the room, I will ask about their corrective action process, how it’s working for them and how many nonconformance’s they document in an average month. A typical answer is a very proud indication that they have a great corrective action system and they generate very few nonconformances. That is a self-contradicting statement.
Chances are very good that nonconformances are seen as a bad thing in these companies and the person responsible for this horrible offense is hunted down and profusely reprimanded for such callous offenses. Does this sound familiar?
Let me set those who still feel that nonconformance’s are bad, THEIR NOT! If you find 3 things going wrong within your organization this week, and resolve them so they never happen again, do you think you have improved your company’s performance? Hello McFly, guess what the bonus is – there’s a pretty good chance you will improve your bottom line as well! So get out there and find as many nonconformances as you can. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Remember, the whole idea is to continually improve your products and processes so that you can compete and grow.
Root Cause Analysis and Continual Improvement
Root cause analysis is a class of problem solving methods aimed at identifying the root causes of problems or events. The practice of root cause analysis is based on the belief that problems are best solved by attempting to correct or eliminate root causes, as opposed to merely addressing the immediately obvious symptoms. By directing corrective measures at root causes, it is hoped that the likelihood of problem recurrence will be minimized. However, it is recognized that complete prevention of recurrence by a single action is not always possible. Thus, root cause analysis is often considered to be a repetitive process, and is frequently viewed as a tool of continuous improvement.
Root cause analysis, initially is a reactive method of problem detection and solving. This means that the analysis is done after an event has occurred. By gaining expertise in root cause analysis it becomes a pro-active method. This means that root cause analysis is able to forecast the possibility of an event even before it could occur.
A well implemented quality management system will include training and understanding of how root cause analysis tools and techniques can be used to promote continuous improvement.